More to a vote than meets the eye
I spoke with Bob Ballou, assistant
to the director of the Rhode Island Department of Environmental Management, and
Rick Bellavance, president of the RI Party & Charter Boat Association about
the December 14, 2012 Atlantic Slates Marine Fisheries Commission’s (ASMFC) deliberations
and votes on Amendment 2 concerning the management of Atlantic Menhaden coastwide. Ballou and Bellavance along with Bill
McElroy, treasure of the RI Lobstermen’s Association, represented Rhode Island
at the ASMFC meeting.
Captain Bellavance said, “The Rhode
Island delegation has one vote… so the three of us deliberate, come to a consensus
and then cast our vote.” Bellavance
continued, “There were diverse opinions and proposals on the issue… industry
processors of Atlantic Menhaden (primarily Omega Protein that catch 80% of all
Atlantic Menhaden) were advocating for a 10% reduction and on the other extreme
some environmental groups were advocating for a 50% reduction. We came to a consensus at 20% and ultimately
cast our vote in favor of this reduction percentage.” Throughout the course of the meeting many voters
were taken, some Bellavance said to facilitate discussion on the issue to
ensure all points of view at the table were heard.
Many in the recreational fishing
community in Rhode Island were disappointed at the 20% reduction approved by
the ASMFC. Don Smith, representing the
Rhode Island Salt Water Association said, “We were advocating for a 30%
reduction and could not understand why the Rhode Island delegation was settling
for less."
Robert Ballou of DEM took the time
last week to outline in detail what happened at the ASMFC meeting and its impact
on the Rhode Island Atlantic Menhaden fishery.
Here is what he had to say.
“The meeting was noteworthy for a number of
reasons:
1. It resulted in the adoption of a first-ever
coastwide quota (total allowable catch, or TAC) for menhaden, reflecting the
ASMFC’s commitment to end overfishing and achieve long-term protection and sustainability
for this ecologically important species, and the people who depend on it.
2.
It
resulted in a new coastwide quota set at 80% of the average coastwide landings
of menhaden over the three-year period 2008-2011 – i.e., 80% of 470 million
pounds = 376 million pounds.
3. It resulted in a state-based allocation
program, which allocates the new coastwide quota according to the average
percentage of each state’s landings over the three-year period 2008-2011.
- Virginia will be allocated 85.3% of the coastwide quota (317
million pounds)
- NJ will receive 11.2% of the coastwide quota (42 million pounds)
- The other 13 states will receive shares ranging from 0% (NH, SC,
and GA) to 1.37% (MD)
- RI will receive 0.02% (about 75,000 pounds)
- It
involved a multi-faceted management program proposal, and an unprecedented
level of public involvement:
- In September, the ASMFC approved for public comment a 143-page
Draft Amendment, which addressed a range of issues, including new
biological reference points, stock rebuilding and fishing mortality
reduction schedules, the establishment of a TAC, the process for
allocating the TAC, reporting requirements, and various other provisions
- The Draft Amendment was subject to 13 public hearings in 10
states, including one in RI; over 500 people attended the hearings;
- The Board received a total of 128,333 written comments on the
Draft Amendment
- Several hundred people attended last Friday’s Board meeting in
Baltimore
- At
the day-long Board meeting, the Board decided upon the various issues via
a series of 40 separate votes.
- The
upshots of the ASMFC’s final approval of Amendment 2 to the ASMFC’s
Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Menhaden, as it relates to Rhode
Island’s interests, are:
- Menhaden migrate in and out of RI waters on a regular basis, and
are an important component of the RI marine ecosystem. The adoption of
new coastwide measures aimed at increasing protection of menhaden, with
particular recognition of the important role they play as forage fish, is
consistent with RI’s long-standing interests vis-à-vis sound conservation
of marine fishery resources.
- RI’s landings over the past ten years have generally ranged from
about 5,000 pounds to about 100,000 pounds. In 2008 -- a banner year, and
an anomaly – 269,000 pounds were landed. RI’s average annual landings
over the past three years have been about 87,000 pounds. The vast
majority of RI’s landings are taken by a handful of fish trap operators
operating in RI waters in the lower Bay and along the southern coast.
- RI has had a very progressive state-waters menhaden protection
program in place for a number of years. The program, which primarily
guards against localized depletion, involves a number of components, the
most significant being that mobile gear (namely, purse-seine) operations
in the Bay are only allowed to target menhaden when they occur in the Bay
in relatively large numbers, exceeding a 2 million pound biomass
threshold, or floor. This RI program is not affected by the new ASMFC
action, and is slated to remain in place in 2013 and thereafter. {Note:
In recent years, there has been just a single purse-seine vessel that has
fished for menhaden in Narragansett Bay, with all landings taking place
in Fall River, MA.}
- RI will need to adopt new state regulations for 2013 to manage its
new 75,000 pound state allocation. While this will likely involve the
imposition of constraints on the fish trap operators, the constraints
will likely be modest, since the State’s allocation is only slightly less
than average annual landings over the past few years. Moreover, the
adoption by ASMFC of a 6,000 pound menhaden bycatch allowance for
non-directed fisheries, not to be counted against the state quotas, will
provide considerable flexibility to the fish-trap operators, and will
help to minimize discard mortality.
- The ASMFC’s new menhaden plan includes an “episodic event set
aside” totaling 1% of the new coastwide quota (i.e., about 3.76 million
pounds), which is available to nine states, including RI, that have
relatively low allocations (less than 2% of bait landings, averaged over
the past three years). While it remains to be seen how this set-aside
will be managed, it is evident that RI will be able to tap into it, to
some degree, if/when large numbers of menhaden show up in RI waters.”
Here is a link to the ASMFC website that summaries meeting deliberations: http://www.asmfc.org/press_releases/meetingWkSummaries/2012/dec14_2012AtlMenhadenBoardPR_Motions.pdf
.
No comments:
Post a Comment