Game changing issues of 2012
A lot has gone on this year that
has and will continue to impact our bays and ocean waters and the health of our
fishery. Here are four major issues that
I thought and wrote about a lot this year.
Global warming
Hurricane Sandy continues to creative
awareness about global warning. Government officials, politicians and coastal residents
in particular are now heightening awareness about the issue. All are making claims that global warming is
real. Senator Sheldon Whitehouse of RI testified
to the damaging effects of Sandy along coastal shores relating that this is now
“the new normal”. Coastal areas will continue
to flood. And, we have to recognize this
as we plan to rebuild. So it is now not
an issue about global warming being real, the dialogue is changing to how to
prepare for it and prevent it from getting worse by reducing our carbon
footprint and preserving our ozone layer as scientist have been telling us
Narragansett Bay and near coastal water temperatures have
been heating up for nearly forty years.
How warm you ask? Well it used to be very cold. The crew of the Brenton Reef lightship measured water temperature at the mouth of Narragansett Bay every day from July 1878 through January 1942. In the coldest winter recorded (1917-18) the water temperature from December through February was 33.2 F. The average for the whole period of their record (64 years) is much warmer at 39.1 F. (Nixon, Granger and Buckley, The Warming of Narragansett Bay, 2003). However, even this temperature of 39.1 F is far from the warmer water temperatures recorded this February 12, 2012… Conimicut Point, 45 F; Newport, 42 F; and Block Island, 46 F.
How warm you ask? Well it used to be very cold. The crew of the Brenton Reef lightship measured water temperature at the mouth of Narragansett Bay every day from July 1878 through January 1942. In the coldest winter recorded (1917-18) the water temperature from December through February was 33.2 F. The average for the whole period of their record (64 years) is much warmer at 39.1 F. (Nixon, Granger and Buckley, The Warming of Narragansett Bay, 2003). However, even this temperature of 39.1 F is far from the warmer water temperatures recorded this February 12, 2012… Conimicut Point, 45 F; Newport, 42 F; and Block Island, 46 F.
Wind power off
our shores now a reality
Obstacle after obstacle have been put in front of scientists,
ocean spatial planners (like zoning in your town accept in the ocean) and wind
energy developers. Two companies,
Deapwater Wind (in RI) and Cape Wind (in MA) have been working with local
fisherman, spatial ocean planners and government officials to site wind farms
in our oceans. They have made great progress
this year thanks to helpful federal policy and local government officials
taking the bull by the horns and pushing this initiative forward. Developers are developing wind farms responsibly. The Bureau of Ocean Energy Management (BOEM) and
agencies like RI Coastal Resources Management Council, that has developed a
model for spatial planning used by others throughout the US, are working with developers
of wind farms to locate and mitigate the impact of wind farms on the
environment and fisheries. It looks like
our five turbine wind farm off Block Island will start construction in 2014. The
wind farm will generate over 125,000 megawatt hours annually, supplying the
majority of Block Island’s electricity needs. Excess power will be exported to
the mainland via the bi-directional Block Island Transmission System. Learnings from this project will be applied
to the 200 plus wind turbine farm planned for the Cox’s Ledge area off Rhode Island. We have a lot of work to do to make sure
these wind farms and others are developed responsibly but we are making great
progress and we are on the right path.
Sector management and catch shares work, we need to keep
these programs rolling
Last month the United States Court of Appeals for the
First Circuit ruled against the cities of New Bedford and Gloucester and
industry plaintiffs in their challenge to Amendment 16, the framework for the
federal government's fisheries catch share system. In an excerpt from
the decision the Court said, “This case involves legal challenges to recent
federal management actions taken in New England's sensitive Multispecies
Groundfish Fishery. We reject the many challenges and affirm entry of summary
judgment for the federal defendants.”
The ruling supports the catch share fisheries management approach
engaged by fish managers in New England. This was the third time the courts ruled in
favor of catch shares. Government officials, fish regulators and mangers in RI and MA
need to stay the course and not be distracted by vocal minorities in the
fishing community that provide very little in the way of positive (proven)
solutions to fishing challenges.
Another example of a successful sector management program is
the RI Fluke Sector Pilot which ran for three years. It was put on hold this year not because it
failed, but many say because local political leaders and regulators believed it
was political expedient to do so. It is
wrong to play politics with fish as Massachusetts leaders did with ground fish
and as we are doing with the RI Fluke Sector Pilot.
In both the RI Fluke Sector and the New England Ground
fish case, annual catch limits were put into place to prevent overfishing and
to rebuild stocks. The idea was to provide fishermen with two options for
controlling fishing effort. Fishermen could either form groups and fish an
allocated share of the total allowed catch or fish individually with a limit on
the number of days spent fishing. Fishing in groups with a total allowable
catch (TAC) offers fishermen flexibility to fish when market prices are highest,
fish for species when they are available and other species are not or when the
weather is good.
Among the trends, were increased revenues and prices. The sector proved to be a very effective way to sustain the resource with record low discard rates (as much as 98% fewer discards than non sector participants). According to a paper presented by Dr. Chris Anderson, a former professor of environmental and natural resource economics at the University of Rhode Island, "...the (RI Pilot) sector shifted fluke landings to times when they could maximize price. Comparing revenues… we find the sector program increased fleet wide (twelve boats in the fleet at this time) revenues over $800,000, including benefits of over $250,000 to non-sector vessels.” So the pilot sector enhanced revenue for its twelve members, but also incurred enhanced revenue for non-sector vessels.
Among the trends, were increased revenues and prices. The sector proved to be a very effective way to sustain the resource with record low discard rates (as much as 98% fewer discards than non sector participants). According to a paper presented by Dr. Chris Anderson, a former professor of environmental and natural resource economics at the University of Rhode Island, "...the (RI Pilot) sector shifted fluke landings to times when they could maximize price. Comparing revenues… we find the sector program increased fleet wide (twelve boats in the fleet at this time) revenues over $800,000, including benefits of over $250,000 to non-sector vessels.” So the pilot sector enhanced revenue for its twelve members, but also incurred enhanced revenue for non-sector vessels.
Our State and US
Congressional delegations and fish mangers should continue to learn from the RI
Fluke Sector Pilot and New England Ground Fish sector because they worked and
have been successful. While listening to one small vocal segment of the fishing
community, some Massachusetts (and Rhode Island) fish mangers and elected
officials were convinced that “catch shares” management models were bad. These
two programs have proved them wrong. Government leaders and fish managers need
to follow the court’s lead, stop playing politics with the fish and keep sector
management rolling in Rhode Island and New England.
ASMFC votes to restrict Atlantic Menhaden catch
On December 14, 2012 the
Atlantic States Marine Fisheries Commission (ASMFC) voted on Draft Amendment 2
to the Interstate Fishery Management Plan for Atlantic Menhaden which outlined
a number of new regulations on the species.
This was a major vote and the first time in that such restrictions have
been put on the harvesting of this important t fish.
Peter
Baker of the PEW Environment Group said “… the ASMFC listened to the science
and the public in taking a historic step to end overfishing of Atlantic
Menhaden and to begin to rebuild the population of this important little fish… By
adopting the first coastwise catch limit on this fishery, the commission has
begun to reverse the 90 percent plunge in the menhaden population over the past
three decades. Sound science clearly calls for leaving more of these fish in
the water to fulfill their ecological role. More menhaden means more food for
ocean wildlife, from seabirds to whales and popular game fish such as striped
bass.”. A
new total allowable catch (TAC) limit along with regulations to achieve it will
help ensure that the Atlantic Menhaden biomass rebuilds and stays at desired
sustainable levels.
In addition to being a great food source for other fish, Atlantic
Menhaden also serve as roving filters, converting algae into energy and thus
reducing nutrient loads in bays and covers. A reduction of nutrients means
fewer algae blooms and ultimately more oxygen for all fish. The ASMFC vote on Atlantic Menhaden was a big
win for the fish and the environment in
Rhode Island and along the east coast.